1.png)
Identifikasi Kemajuan Penerapan Konsep Kota Cerdas di Kota Yogyakarta
Sari
ABSTRAK
Konsep kota cerdas yang populer di dunia dalam beberapa tahun terakhir telah menjadikan banyak kota lebih efektif dan efisien dalam tata kelolanya. Penggunaan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi (ICT) melekat dalam proses pengembangannya dengan berbagai macam otomatisasi dan kecerdasan buatan (AI) yang membantu keberjalanannya. Hal tersebut tentu baik bagi kota jika penerapannya dapat berhasil mencapai tujuan. Berdasarkan pernyataan tersebut maka penelitian ini melakukan identifikasi kemajuan penerapan kota cerdas pada salah satu kota di Indonesia yaitu Kota Yogyakarta yang juga sudah menerapkan konsep kota cerdas sejak tahun 2018 dan masih kental dengan budayanya sehingga tidak melupakan kearifan lokal yang juga penting dipertahankan. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan mengidentifikasi kemajuan penerapan kota cerdas di Kota Yogyakarta yang selanjutnya dibandingkan pada salah satu kota cerdas terbaik pada aspek manajemen dan kebencanaan di dunia yaitu Kota Matsuyama menggunakan analisis gap. Kemudian pada akhir penelitian, diberikan rekomendasi berdasarkan hasil analisis gap berupa rencana pengembangan untuk mengoptimalkan penerapan konsep kota cerdas di Kota Yogyakarta.
Â
ABSTRACT
The smart city concept that is popular in the world in recent years has made many cities more effective and efficient in their management. The use of information and communication technology (ICT) is inherent in the development process with various kinds of automation and artificial intelligence (AI) that help it run. It is certainly good for the city if its implementation can successfully achieve the goal. Based on this statement, this study identifies the progress of implementing smart cities in one of the cities in Indonesia, namely the City of Yogyakarta, which has also implemented the smart city concept since 2018 and is still thick with culture so that it does not forget local wisdom which is also important to maintain. This research was conducted by identifying the progress of implementing a smart city in Yogyakarta City which was then compared to one of the best smart cities in terms of management and disaster aspects in the world, namely Matsuyama City using gap analysis. Then at the end of the stud, recommendations are given based on the results of the gap analysis in the form of a development plan to optimize the application of the smart city concept in the city of Yogyakarta.
Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Angelidou, M. (2017). The Role of Smart City Characteristics in the Plans of Fifteen Cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(4), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1348880
Anthopoulos, L. G., Pourzolfaghar, Z., Lemmer, K., Siebenlist, T., Niehaves, B., & Nikolaou, I. (2022). Smart cities as hubs: Connect, collect and control city flows. Cities, 125(March), 103660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103660
Badan Pusat Statistika. (2021). Kota Yogyakarta Dalam Angka 2021. BPS Kota Yogyakarta, 1–446.
Bappeda Kota Yogyakarta. (2017). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah (RPJMD) Kota Yogyakarta Tahun 2017-2022.
Bénard, D. (2021). Why Singapore, Zurich and Oslo are the world’s “smartest†cities. ETX Daily Up. https://dailyup.etxstudio.com/articles/rn/en/news_2266629/technology/why-singapore-zurich-and-oslo-are-the-worlds-smartest-cities
Boukerche, A., & Coutinho, R. W. L. (2018). Smart Disaster Detection and Response System for Smart Cities. Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, 2018-June, 1102–1107. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC.2018.8538356
Centre For Cities. (2014). Smart Cities. UK. http://www.centreforcities.org
Chondrogianni, D. V., & Stephanedes, Y. J. (2022). Performance Model of Urban Resilience and Smartness Plans for Open Spaces in Smart Cities. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 142 (2).
Delft University of Technology and South China University of Technology. (2015). New life for ageing cities. Urban Systems and Environment (USE) Joint Research Centre between SCUT and TU Delft.
Evans, J. (2018). D2 . 1 Common Monitoring and Impact Assessment Framework (Issue February 2017). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11179.34082
GCCPLN. (2015). No Title. UN Agencies. https://citiesprogramme.org/our framework/multi partner high impact sustainable urban development projects platform/
Gerasopoulos, E., Bailey, J., Athanasopoulou, E., Speyer, O., Kocman, D., Raudner, A., Tsouni, A., Kontoes, H., Johansson, C., Georgiadis, C., Matthias, V., Kussul, N., Aquilino, M., & Paasonen, P. (2022). Earth observation: An integral part of a smart and sustainable city. Environmental Science and Policy, 132(March), 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.02.033
Huovila, A., Bosch, P., & Airaksinen, M. (2019). Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for Smart sustainable cities: What indicators and standards to use and when? Cities, 89(January), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.029
Hutama, I. A. W., & Djunaedi, A. (2019). Mapping the Category of Smart City’s Dimensions Based on the Innovation of Applications and Websites for Cities Management in Indonesia. Tataloka, 21(3), 445–458. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/tataloka/article/view/2993/pdf
Kementerian PUPR. (2015). Kajian Pengembangan Smart City di Indonesia.
Lee, S. K., Kwon, H. R., Cho, H., Kim, J., & Lee, D. (2016). International Case Studies of Smart Cities: Singapore, Republic of Singapore. IDB-KRIHS Joint Research, June.
Matsuoka, H., Furuya, J., Tsuchiya, C., Ushiyama, J., & Deguchi, A. (2021). Actions of Hitachi-UTokyo Laboratory toward Realizing Next-generation Smart Cities. Innovations to Improve People’s Quality of Life, Vol. 70, 1, 68–73.
Mohd Adnan, Y., Dali, M., Hamzah, H., & Nasir Daud, M. (2016). Comparative Overview of Smart Cities Initiatives : Singapore and Seoul. International Real Estate Researchers Symposium (IRERS), April.
Mohd Adnan, Y., Hamzah, H., Md Dali, M., Nasir Daud, M., & Anuar Alias. (2016). An initiatives-based framework for assessing smart city. Planning Malaysia, 5, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v14.i5.189
NASA. (2012). Technology Readiness Level. NASA. https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/heo/scan/engineering/technology/technology_readiness_level
Orejon-Sanchez, R. D., Crespo-Garcia, D., Andres-Diaz, J. R., & Gago-Calderon, A. (2022). Smart cities’ development in Spain: A comparison of technical and social indicators with reference to European cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 81(March), 103828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103828
Pacheco Rocha, N., Dias, A., Santinha, G., Rodrigues, M., Rodrigues, C., Queirós, A., Bastardo, R., & Pavão, J. (2022). Systematic literature review of context-awareness applications supported by smart cities’ infrastructures. SN Applied Sciences, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-022-04979-0
Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta. (2021). Rencana Detail Tata Ruang Kota Yogyakarta Tahun 2021 – 2041.
Picatoste, J., Pérez-Ortiz, L., Ruesga-Benito, S. M., & Novo-Corti, I. (2018). Smart cities for wellbeing: youth employment and their skills on computers. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 9(2), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-04-2017-0014
PSPPR UGM. (2016). Road Map Kota Yogyakarta Menuju Smart City. Jurnal Online Universitas Gadjah Mada, 1, 1–27.
Samosir, H. I., Primandhana, W. P., & Wahed, M. (2021). Analisis Potensi Sektor Ekonomi Di Kota Solo dan Semarang Provinsi Jawa Tengah dan Kota Yogyakarta Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Syntax Idea, 3(5), 6.
Shah, M. N., Nagargoje, S., & Shah, C. (2017). Assessment of Ahmedabad ( India ) and Shanghai ( China ) on Smart City Parameters Applying the Boyd Cohen Smart City Wheel. 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0855-9
Sutriadi, R. (2018). Tekno Polis: Perspektif Perencana Kota. ITB Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26760/jrh.v6i2.127-140
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Alamat redaksi dan tata usaha:
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Institut Teknologi Nasional
Fakultas, gedung 14 Lantai 3
Jl. PHH. Mustapa 23 Bandung 40124
Tlp. 022-7272215 Pes. 159, Fax. 022-7202892,
e-mail: hrekayasa@itenas.ac.id
Terindeks:
Jurnal ini terlisensi oleh Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
