Perancangan dan Analisis Redistribution Routing Protocol OSPF dan EIGRP

DWI ARYANTA, BAYU AGUNG PRANATA

Abstract


ABSTRAK

OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) dan EIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol) adalah dua routing protokol yang banyak digunakan dalam jaringan komputer. Perbedaan karakteristik antar routing protokol menimbulkan masalah dalam pengiriman paket data. Teknik redistribution adalah solusi untuk melakukan komunikasi antar routing protokol. Dengan menggunakan software Cisco Packet Tracer 5.3 pada penelitian ini dibuat simulasi OSPF dan EIGRP yang dihubungkan oleh teknik redistribution, kemudian dibandingkan kualitasnya dengan single routing protokol EIGRP dan OSPF. Parameter pengujian dalam penelitian ini adalah nilai time delay dan trace route. Nilai trace route berdasarkan perhitungan langsung cost dan metric dibandingkan dengan hasil simulasi. Hasilnya dapat dilakukan proses redistribution OSPF dan EIGRP. Nilai delay redistribution lebih baik 1% dibanding OSPF dan 2-3% di bawah EIGRP tergantung kepadatan traffic. Dalam perhitungan trace route redistribution dilakukan 2 perhitungan, yaitu cost untuk area OSPF dan metric pada area EIGRP. Pengambilan jalur utama dan alternatif pengiriman paket berdasarkan nilai cost dan metric yang terkecil, hal ini terbukti berdasarkan perhitungan dan simulasi.

Kata kunci: OSPF, EIGRP, Redistribution, Delay, Cost, Metric.


ABSTRACT

OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) and EIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol) are two routing protocols are widely used in computer networks. Differences between the characteristics of routing protocols pose a problem in the delivery of data packets. Redistribution technique is the solution for communication between routing protocols. By using the software Cisco Packet Tracer 5.3 in this study were made simulating OSPF and EIGRP redistribution linked by technique, then compared its quality with a single EIGRP and OSPF routing protocols. Testing parameters in this study is the value of the time delay and trace route. Value trace route based on direct calculation of cost and metric compared with the simulation results. The result can be OSPF and EIGRP redistribution process. Value delay redistribution 1% better than OSPF and EIGRP 2-3% under traffic density dependent. In calculating the trace route redistribution is done 2 calculations, the cost for OSPF area and the area of the EIGRP metric. Making primary and alternate paths based on the packet delivery rate and the cost of the smallest metric, it is proved by calculation and simulation.

Keywords: OSPF, EIGRP, Redistribution, Delay, Cost, Metric.


References


Sofana, Iwan. (2012). CISCO CCNP dan jaringan Komputer (Materi Route, Switch, & Troubleshooting). Bandung : Informatika.

Shewandagn Lemma, Esuendale. ( 2009). Performance Comparison of EIGRP / IS-IS and OSPF / IS-IS. Swedia : Blekinge Institute of Technology.

Priyambodho, Dimas. (2014). Analisis Kinerja Routing Protokol EIGRP dan OSPF pada Topologi Ring dan Mesh. Bandung : Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung.

Priyadi, Taufiq Agung. (2014). Perancangan dan Analisa Perbandingan Implementasi OSPF pada Jaringan IPv4 dan Ipv6. Bandung : Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung.

Sofana, Iwan. (2012), CISCO CCNA dan Jaringan Komputer. Bandung : Informatika.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26760/elkomika.v2i2.85

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ISSN (print) : 2338-8323 | ISSN (electronic) : 2459-9638

Publisher:

Department of Electrical Engineering Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung, Indonesia

Address: 20th Building  Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung PHH. Mustofa Street No. 23 Bandung 40124, Indonesia

Contact: +627272215 (ext. 206)

Email: jte.itenas@itenas.ac.id________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Free counters!

Web

Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter

Statistic Journal

Jurnal ini terlisensi oleh Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License