Analisis Jumlah Pengguna pada Traffic IP-based dengan Multi Criteria Decision Making

MARISA PREMITASARI

doi:10.26760/mindjournal.v5i2.92-107

Analisis Jumlah Pengguna pada Traffic IP-based dengan Multi Criteria Decision Making

MARISA PREMITASARI

Sari

Abstrak

Trafik telekomunikasi sudah bermigrasi ke IP-based Traffic. Salah satunya adalah Laboratorium TIK (Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi) ITENAS yang meng-generate invarian trafik. Pada penelitian ini, penulis melakukan monitoring pasif dan aktif untuk mendapatkan berbagai invarian trafik. Monitoring pasif didapatkan dari software ISP Moratel dan SOPHOS Firewall. Monitoring aktif dilakukan dengan capture data secara live pada waktu jam sibuk. Invarian trafik yang berhasil di-captured adalah incoming traffic, outgoing traffic, speed, volume, date dan downtime. Jam sibuk diambil berdasarkan dugaan sementara Â mulai pukulÂ 10.00-16.00.Â Invarian ini menjadi input dari sistem untuk dijadikan kriteria dan jam sibuk Â dijadikan atribut. Kriteria dan atribut Â diolah dengan metoda Multi Criteria Decision Making yaitu SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) dan AHP(Analytical Hierarchy Process). Output dari sistem adalah prediksi jumlah pengguna di jam sibuk dengan skala fuzzy rules. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan pukul 11.00 AM-12.00 PM adalah jam tersibuk dengan jumlah user terbanyak.

Kata kunci: monitoring aktif, monitoring pasif, kriteria, atribut,bobot

Abstract

Telecommunication traffic has migrated to IP-based traffic .One of the industry is Laboratorium TIK ITENASÂ (Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi)Â which generates traffic Â invariant. In this study, the authors conducted passive and active monitoring to obtain various traffic invariance. Passive monitoring were obtained from ISP Moratel software and SOPHOS Firewall. Active monitoring were done by capturing live data during peak hours. Traffic invariance that have been captured consist Â incoming traffic, outgoing traffic, speed, volume, date and downtime. Busy hours were taken based on personal estimation start from 10.00-16.00. This invariance became the systemâ€™s input Â which has been used as criteria and peak hours are used as attributes. Criteria and attributes were processed using the Multi Criteria Decision Making method, namely SAW (Simple Additive Weighting and AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process). The output of the system is userâ€™s number predictionÂ with fuzzy scale. The resultÂ concluded that 11.00 AM-12.00 PM is theÂ busiest hours with the most number of users

Keywords: active monitoring, passive monitoring, criterion, attributes, weight

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi

Afshari, A., Mohajed, M., & Yusuff, R. M. (2010). Simple Additive Weighting Approach to Personal Selection Problem. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 1(5), 511-515. doi:10.7763/IJIMT.2010.V1.89

Dede, G., Kamalakis, T., & Varoutas, D. (2011). Evaluation of Optical Wireless Technologies in Home Networking : An Analytical Hierarchy Approach. Journal of Optical Communication and Networking, 3(11), 850-859. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.3.000850

E, N., Chu, X., Guo, W., & Zhang, J. (2013). User Data Traffic Analysis For 3G Celullar Networks. Paper presented at the 2013 8th International Conference on Communications and Networking in China (CHINACOM), Guilin,China.

Harli, E. (2016). Pemilihan Network Monitoring System Berdasarkan Kajian Efektifitas Sistem Informasi dengan Pendekatan AHP : Studi Kasus pada â€œPT.TUVâ€. Jurnal Edukasi dan Penelitian Informatika (JEPIN), 2(1), 64-70. doi:10.26418/jp.v2i1.15555

Haryadi, S., & Premitasari, M. (2014). Traffic analysis of number of request per user and Volume per Request Hits on IP networks. Paper presented at the 2014 8th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems Services and Applications (TSSA), Kuta,Indonesia.

Kaliszewski, I., & Podkopaev, D. (2016). Simple additive weightingâ€”A metamodel for multiple criteria decision analysis methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 54, 155-161. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.042

Khan, R., Kumar, P., Jayakody, D. N. K., & Liyanage, M. (2019). A Survey on Security and Privacy of 5G Technologies: Potential Solutions,Recent Advancements and Future Directions. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 22(1), 196-248. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2019.2933899

Mohan, V., Reddy, Y. R. J., & Kalpana, K. (2011). Active and Passive Network Measurements : A Survey. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies (IJCSIT), 2(4), 1372-1385.

Nofriansyah, D. (2015). Konsep Data Mining Vs Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (1 ed.). Sleman: Deepublish.

Pawestri, D., & Sihwi, S. W. (2012). Perbandingan Penggunaan Metode AHP dan SAW untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Paket Layanan Internet. ITSMART:Jurnal Teknologi dan Informasi, 1(2), 74-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.20961/itsmart.v1i2.596

Premitasari, M. (2018). Volume Traffic IP-Based dengan Pemodelan Jam Sibuk. MIND, 3(1), 1-14.

Rohandi, M., Tuloli, M. Y., & Jassin, R. T. (2018). Priority Determination of Underwater Tourism Site Development in Gorontalo Province using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Paper presented at the ICIEVE 2017, Manado Indonesia.

Sahir, S. H., Rosmawati, R., & Minan, K. (2017). Simple Additive Weighting Method to Determining EmployeeSalary Increase Rate. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJSRSET), 3(8), 42-48.

Yigit,T., Isik, A. H., & Ince,M. (2013). Web-based Learning Object Selection Software Using Analytical Hierarchy Process. IET Software, 174-183.

Ungkawa, U., Faruqi, R., & Fachrudin, N. F. (2019). Perbandingan Metode Multifactor Evaluation Process dan Analytical Hierarchy Process. Studi kasus :Promosi Jabatan di Biro Kepegawaian Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung. MIND Journal, 4(2), 111-121.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26760/mindjournal.v5i2.92-107